When in 2-TE formation, Fasano, who is said to be a decent up-and-coming all-around TE should be accounted for. I am sure Reid and Co. are aware of this. How do you all see his possible impact, or lack thereof?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
On Fasano: a bigger factor in the Boys passing game, or not?
Collapse
X
-
Re: On Fasano: a bigger factor in the Boys passing game, or
Originally posted by ThoughtProcessWhen in 2-TE formation, Fasano, who is said to be a decent up-and-coming all-around TE should be accounted for. I am sure Reid and Co. are aware of this. How do you all see his possible impact, or lack thereof?
Comment
-
Personally, I don't think Parcells has the guts to send out two TEs into receiving routes against the Eagles. He wants us to blitz, and he wants to max protect to pick it up. Perhaps he'll start to do that later in the game if the Eagles don't blitz early on. Then hopefully Johnson can switch up on the fly, and send Dawk flying through the empty spot.
Comment
-
[quote=The Captain]Originally posted by CapOriginally posted by "The Captain":95cf6I was just gonna say...nothing to worry about, Sal Fasano sucks.
Give too much attention to Witten..This kid could have 5 catches
Comment
-
I don't know how much 2 TE the Boys are going to run, but I do think they will have Bledsoe throw from a lot of short drops. Get the ball out quick. I don't know how healthy Lito and Hood are, and I really don't like the idea of Joselio Hanson trying to cover TO or Glenn.
The Eagles front four on defense are the key to this game. If they can get pressure, and be disruptive, we don't have to expose the corners much. If they can't get pressure, then I think there will be opportunities for big plays. The last thing we want is a repeat of what happened at Dallas last year. The pass rush from the front four needs to be there.
Comment
-
"I don't know how much 2 TE the Boys are going to run, but I do think they will have Bledsoe throw from a lot of short drops."
How did that work out for the Pack?
Not disagreeing with you at all, I think they take the same approach as GB did, bu tthey will try and run more and then dink and dunk their way down the field.
Again it will come down to how well they can execute that kind of O, for very long drives. And how well our D can keep them in 3rd and longs, and make sure that they have to earn every yeard they get. No stupid penalties, cause some turnovers and apply pressure even if it can't be sacks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ThoughtProcessIMK, I guess I meant that should he be considered a bigger receiving threat than usual, as the coaching staff accounts for every opposing player, as you have correctly stated
Comment
Comment