Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cherry Picking and Jordon Matthews

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cherry Picking and Jordon Matthews

    Jordan Matthews and the Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence



    Evan Habeeb-USA TODAY Sports
     TWEET SHARE PIN


    Sounds like a Harry Potter movie, doesn't it?


    On Sunday, August 6, 2017, ESPN wrote the following about Jordan Matthews:

    He ranks first in receptions (225) and third in receiving yards (2,673) among all-time Eagles in their first three years, and is one of only five players in NFL history with 65-plus receptions and 800-plus receiving yards in each of their first three seasons. The other four? Randy Moss, Odell Beckham Jr., Mike Evans and A.J. Green. Not bad.


    In statistics, this is what’s known as The Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence (aka Cherry Picking). Cherry picking is defined by Wikipedia as:

    The act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.

    In other words, let’s make sure we pick juuuuuuuusssst enough receptions to take out the deep threats like Desean Jackson but not enough yards to disqualify Jordan Matthews himself! Let's make sure we don't include juggernauts like Calvin Johnson or Brandin Cooks that were not asked to do much in their rookie seasons! While we’re at it, we certainly better make sure not include players that got hurt in even one of their first three seasons, like Sammy Watkins! Yaaaayyyy!


    The result? A well-crafted list of 5 receivers in NFL history to achieve an arbitrary stat line! But not only are you fine-tuning an argument specifically for the player you are trying to support, you're putting him in company where he clearly does not belong!

    Evans averages: 79 rec, 1193 yards, 9 TDs
    Beckham averages: 96 rec, 1374 yards, 12 TDs
    Green averages: 80 rec, 1189 yards, 8 TDs
    Moss averages: 77 rec, 1205 yards, 12 TDs
    WOW!!!
    Jordan Matthews averages: 75 rec, 891 yards, 6 TDs
    Meh.


    So yes, he's purposefully included in your group of 5 players, but even then, just barely. Over 24 COMBINED seasons, the other 4 in that group averaged 5 more catches for a whopping 329 additional yards and 4 more TDs (80 rec, 1221 yards, 11 TDs). Does he really fit? Not to mention, Amari Cooper and Michael Thomas are likely to join that same "club" over the next couple of years.


    But wait….there’s more!!!


    Jordan Matthews "achieved" this amazing feat from the slot position while those other four wide receivers not only dominated on the outside but also as the team’s #1 wide receiver and best offensive weapon, meaning defensive coordinators were scheming to find a way to stop them. Teams that have a lockdown cornerback that can switch sides would lock up that player in man-to-man coverage for the entire game. We’re talking about cornerbacks that will eventually be in the Hall of Fame. Others have a lockdown corner that doesn't switch sides, but deploy in 1v1 man coverage when that receiver is on their side. These are potential Hall of Famers as well. Still other teams that don’t have that caliber player, used bracket coverage (See: Team, Double) to limit their effectiveness over the top and/or a middle linebacker to reduce their contribution underneath. That's a lot of resources spent to stop them...with very little effectiveness.


    Not Jordan Matthews. Coordinators don’t scheme to stop him. Due to his limitations, they know exactly where he will be on every play. And, even if he doesn’t drop the ball, his 11.3 ypc is not the thing that strikes fear in the hearts of defenses. When teams want to stop the run, he’ll see a LINEBACKER in coverage. When they want to stop the pass, he’ll see a nickel corner that is probably giving up 3-6 inches in height and 30+ pounds…that was likely on the roster bubble during training camp. With that kind of attention, he absolutely SHOULD be in the list he’s in…but his numbers should more closely resemble the others.

    Conclusion:
    The bottom line is this. Jordan Matthews is a flawed receiver. However, he's a hard worker with zero off-field issues that even handles himself well in front of the cameras (most of the time…JMatt, don’t bring up mock drafts, lol). But tell me you wouldn't trade Jordan Matthews, straight up, for other secondary options IN THE DIVISION like Sterling Shephard from the New York Giants, Jamison Crowder from the Washington Football Team, or even Cole Beasley from the Dallas Cowgirls? Would you not trade him, straight up, even for former Eagles Desean Jackson or Jeremy Maclin?? What about for a converted quarterback like Terrelle Pryor?? Or maybe for a much better (primary) slot receiver like Jarvis Landry, who’s only excluded from this list because of 42 yards in his 10-game rookie season?? Or possibly for a Randall Cobb who is a matchup nightmare anywhere and has seen catch rates above 70% for his entire career??


    This is not about liking/disliking. This is about what is best for your football team. And what is best for them is to NOT pay a player who has been extraordinarily average like he has been extraordinarily good, due to inflated targets/snaps and volume-based stats. My favorite, go-to line about the salary cap is that it is a pie chart, not a bar graph. For every player that you overpay, you lose the ability to sign another, whether that’s in-house or via free agency. To illustrate that very succinctly, Jordan Matthews’ contract could be the reason we don’t have the money to lock up Jordan Hicks or Alshon Jeffrey long term. Is that worth it for a player who, on the field, is so easily replaced? For a player who has consistently left us underwhelmed in the big situations? For a player who let two perfectly placed touchdowns go by the wayside for his rookie QB just last year when, by his own words, needed to be the leader for the Eagles’ receivers? Those two catches alone would have taken his QB rating from a 79.3 to an 81.7 (given he threw an interception after the play where he failed to drag his foot)!


    In the end, you’ve got to stop citing these types of stats for your argument. Because, I don’t have the numbers, but I’d bet there is another list that he probably belongs to:

    How many receivers have seen over 100 targets every year since entering the league, but have yet to top 1,000 yards in a season by Year 3?


    And, in this one post, I have managed to name 15 NFL wide receivers that you would likely rather have over Jordan Matthews. He’s average…but he won’t be paid that way. And I, for one, would never pay Morton's price for an Outback steak.
    "Hey Giants, who's your Daddy?"

  • #2
    I'm trying to figure out how anyone knows what type of contract offer Matthews will receive as a FA. I agree he's not the best. I can't see 10 million or more as I have read being mentioned. I also don't see a team giving us value for him because of the contract and because he isn't all that. I feel we need him because do you really want to trust Agholor? Hollins might become the 3rd receiver but I'm thinking he's going to move Smith out of the lineup at some point. Pumphrey and Sproles have been mentioned as lining up in the slot. Maybe that will be enough. I don't get the Matthews love nor the bashing. He is an OK receiver, I can't see him breaking the bank. Disclaimer: I've been wrong plenty of times before.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think he has more value to the team this year than what they would get in a trade. They would probably move him if they got an offer that was decent, but I just don't see anyone offering up much value for a slot WR in the last year of his contract. My guess is he plays out the last year of his deal, and they let him walk in FA.

      Comment


      • #4
        EB and Ross, you pretty much summed things up. I think that we are better off with him, but then again we need to see what Hollins, Johnson and the others can do eventually. Lets face it, he's a decent number 3 receiver. The biggest problem is he's not worth anything in a trade. You'd be lucky to get a 6th for him. His numbers should go way down this year with so many other targets on this team for a change. He also could be part of a very rare trade after the season starts I suppose if a team is desperate for a wr due to injuries. Then again that team is usually us. I'll bet the Eagles figure he's as good as we could get when Jeffreys goes down.
        "Hey Giants, who's your Daddy?"

        Comment


        • #5
          And I will say the writer did what he was bashing others of doing. Cherry picking.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Rossovich View Post
            And I will say the writer did what he was bashing others of doing. Cherry picking.
            Good one Ross! Let's face it, Matthews is an average NFL receiver. Maybe a C+ but that's as far as I go anyway.
            "Hey Giants, who's your Daddy?"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Eagle60 View Post
              Good one Ross! Let's face it, Matthews is an average NFL receiver. Maybe a C+ but that's as far as I go anyway.
              I'd rate Matthews a B. And let's face it, we need him. As much as everyone is praising our WR group, none of them have proven what they can do in this offense besides Matthews. Even if Jeffery-Smith-Agholor become our 1-2-3, we need Matthews for depth.
              Canada's #1 Eagles fan.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Eagle60 View Post
                Good one Ross! Let's face it, Matthews is an average NFL receiver. Maybe a C+ but that's as far as I go anyway.
                Numbers can be twisted.

                Comment

                Working...
                X