Therefore claiming that he shouldn't have to pay back the money Rosenhaus says he lent him.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/s...in-2009-1.html
In the docs, DeSean says he shouldn't have to pay Drew a dime because a huge chunk of the cash was given to him to induce DeSean to use D.R. in his next contract negotiation.
Why is that a big deal? Because according to DeSean, it's a huge violation of NFLPA rules -- for which the NFLPA punishment is that DeSean wouldn't have to repay a single cent.
Now for the cool part ... part of the money he received from Drew came IN CASH -- stuffed inside a Louis Vuitton bag he received just after midnight on Nov. 10, 2009. It was reported a day later that Jackson had fired his previous representation, and intended on hiring Rosenhaus
Why is that a big deal? Because according to DeSean, it's a huge violation of NFLPA rules -- for which the NFLPA punishment is that DeSean wouldn't have to repay a single cent.
Now for the cool part ... part of the money he received from Drew came IN CASH -- stuffed inside a Louis Vuitton bag he received just after midnight on Nov. 10, 2009. It was reported a day later that Jackson had fired his previous representation, and intended on hiring Rosenhaus
Comment