Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Philly Voice-Potential Cap Casualties

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Philly Voice-Potential Cap Casualties

    Per Kempski.

    http://www.phillyvoice.com/look-pote...ap-casualties/

    Trent Cole, OLB: $11,625,000 cap figure in 2015, savings of $8,425,000 if cut.
    Cole did a good job transitioning from his role as a 4-3 DE for the entirety of his career to a 3-4 OLB the last two seasons. But clearly, with Cole turning 33 during the 2015 season, his most productive days are behind him. Cole may be amenable to a pay cut, but there is somewhere in the vicinity of a 0% chance the Eagles keep him at his current salary cap figure.

    Cary Williams, CB: $8,166,668 cap figure in 2015, savings of $6.5 million if cut.

    Williams has the fourth highest 2015 cap number on the team. Repeat: Cary Williams has the fourth highest 2015 cap number on the team. So... Cary Williams can stay and start for the Eagles, or they can use the $6.5 million they'll save to sign a much better player who doesn't bitch: Such a tough decision there.

    DeMeco Ryans, ILB: $6.9 million cap figure in 2015, savings of $6.9 million if cut.

    The Eagles are severely lacking for ILB depth, so they need DeMeco Ryans and will likely play "wait and see" with him. If Ryans can come back from his torn Achilles and be something close to the player he was in 2014, then overpaying him a bit is a necessary evil. However, when the Eagles get to training camp, if they determine that his Achilles causing him to decline further, he could be a player the Eagles cut to make room for their 2016 free agents, which could be a costly bunch.

    Todd Herremans, OG: $5.2 million cap figure in 2015, savings of $2.8 million if cut.

    Assuming he recovers from a torn bicep, Herremans (33 in October) likely isn't going anywhere this offseason, especially on a team lacking offensive line depth. Saving 2.8 million off the cap isn't worth cutting a player who has established continuity with Jason Kelce to his left and Lane Johnson to his right. Maybe in 2016, when his cap savings would be $5 million.

    Brent Celek, TE: $4.8 million cap figure in 2015, savings of $4.8 million if cut.

    Chip Kelly loves him some Brent Celek. Via Zach Berman of the Inquirer:
    "When you talk about what a Philadelphia Eagle looks like," Kelly said, "Brent Celek is what a Philadelphia Eagle looks like."
    Kelly called Celek "everything you want," elaborating that he is the "ultimate" professional who is "totally selfless." From Kelly, there are few better compliments. Because for all the attention devoted to Kelly's scheme and innovation, he's as devoted to how a player fits within the culture.

    In 2014, Celek had 32 catches for 340 yards, 34% of which came in a blowout against the Panthers. He didn't score his first TD until the meaningless Week 17 game against the Giants. His receiving numbers have also been declining every year since 2011:
    2011: 811
    2012: 684
    2013: 502
    2014: 340

    Celek is the best blocking TE on the team, but is that worth the $4.8 million he's due in 2015? Secondly, are the Eagles more dangerous offense with Celek on the field than they are with Zach Ertz? In my opinion, the answer to both questions is no.

    But, #CULTURE!

    James Casey, 'Swiss army knife' who almost never plays in the regular offense: $4 million cap figure in 2015, savings of $4 million if cut.

    Casey is unquestionably a very valuable special teams player, playing on what was the best special teams units in the league in 2014. But certainly, Casey had to have envisioned a bigger role in the regular offense when he signed with the Eagles during the 2013 offseason. To date, Casey has played just 15.13% of the Eagles' snaps since he signed in Philly

    In fact, Casey has made $24,242 per offensive snap since he's been an Eagle.
    Casey has had trouble getting on the field because Celek is a better blocker, and Ertz is a more dynamic receiver. Casey also has to worry about 2014 undrafted free agent Trey Burton gaining an extended role as a "do a lot" player with many of the same versatile traits.

    While Casey's production in the regular offense is lacking (which may not necessarily be his fault), do you mess around and cut one of your most valuable players on the best special teams units in the league? I'd lean toward no.

    Nolan Carroll, Dime CB: $2.9 million cap figure in 2015, savings of $2.9 million if cut.

    Paying $2.9 million to a dime CB who the coaching staff didn't trust to start over Bradley Fletcher is excessive. The Eagles can't cut Carroll until they have enough pieces to replace him, but watch for Carroll to have his cap number working against him when the final 53 is determined before the season begins.


    The elephant in the room

    LeSean McCoy, RB: $11,950,000 million cap figure in 2015, savings of $7,550,000 million if cut, savings of 8,550,000 if traded.

    The Eagles couldn't possibly get rid of DeSean Jackson and LeSean McCoy in consecutive seasons, could they?

    Of the players on this list, with the exception of maybe James Casey, McCoy is the only player in this article with any kind of trade value whatsoever. McCoy has a huge cap number in 2015, and while he is willing to restructure (translation: take more guaranteed money, which every player would want to do), he is not going to listen to any pay cut talk.
    McCoy's situation could be a 1000 word post on its own (and maybe it will be later this week), but the reality is that the Eagles don't have another running back on the roster ready to take over for McCoy is he were to go the DeSean route. Darren Sproles is a change of pace guy only, and Chris Polk has not proven he can stay healthy. The only way the Eagles could ever jettison McCoy is if they already had another proven quality runner in place first.

    And obviously, as noted above, there are plenty of other ways the Eagles could save cap space before they need to do something drastic with McCoy.

  • #2
    For team chemistry, i hope they are fair to everyone of these guys but they all have to be restructured....except for Williams. I would take williams back if he would restructure though. He is not horrible.

    Also, count me all in on trading mccoy for a second round pick if you can get it.
    You know Darren if you'd have told me 10 years ago that someday I was going to solve the world's energy problems I'd have said your crazy.... now lets drop this big ball of oil out the window.

    Comment


    • #3
      Williams is going to be a hard decision. If they can get him to restructure, then great. Otherwise... I'm honestly not sure they could do better than him for $6.5 million (and if they can, they may be best off upgrading Fletcher first).

      What they really may need is LB depth, someone who can cover and tackle. It seemed to me that once Ryans was hurt, they either had to play Matthews (OK vs run but couldn't cover) or Carroll in the dime as essentially a LB in order to cover, which would force them to play a safety in closer in order to not get steamrolled by running games, leaving single safety high a lot of the time -- and Fletcher with no help was awful. Unfortunately, that's going to be true of a *lot* of cornerbacks. Losing Ryans and Foles in the same game was a body blow to the season, I think. We still did OK but that was the difference between playoffs and no playoffs, I think.


      I want no part of trading McCoy. It's a steep contract but I'm guessing he'd be OK with restructuring (for more guaranteed money of course). The current public posturing sounds more like agent-forced statements. McCoy's numbers were basically fine once Johnson came back.

      Comment


      • #4
        [QUOTE=FairOaks;263038]Williams is going to be a hard decision. If they can get him to restructure, then great. Otherwise... I'm honestly not sure they could do better than him for $6.5 million (and if they can, they may be best off upgrading Fletcher first).

        What they really may need is LB depth, someone who can cover and tackle. It seemed to me that once Ryans was hurt, they either had to play Matthews (OK vs run but couldn't cover) or Carroll in the dime as essentially a LB in order to cover, which would force them to play a safety in closer in order to not get steamrolled by running games, leaving single safety high a lot of the time -- and Fletcher with no help was awful. Unfortunately, that's going to be true of a *lot* of cornerbacks. Losing Ryans and Foles in the same game was a body blow to the season, I think. We still did OK but that was the difference between playoffs and no playoffs, I think.


        I want no part of trading McCoy. It's a steep contract but I'm guessing he'd be OK with restructuring (for more guaranteed money of course). The current public posturing sounds more like agent-forced statements. McCoy's numbers were basically fine once Johnson came back.[/
        QUOTE]

        I think trading McCoy would be a horrible mistake. For the life of me I don't know why we don't at least experiment with Boykin at CB! Williams could be OK if anybody could talk some common sense into him.
        "Hey Giants, who's your Daddy?"

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Eagle60 View Post
          For the life of me I don't know why we don't at least experiment with Boykin at CB!
          This! I dont get it either.

          Comment

          Working...
          X