When this question was posed this afternoon to Sal Palantoni on ESPN radio I assumed he'd give the same answer most (if not all) of us would...selceting Juan Castillo as DC.
He didn't even mention Castillo, and answered in essence that the biggest mistake was, 'Not paying Jackson'. He went on to explain that he didn't mean the FO should have caved to DJax/Rosenpigs' outrageous top 5 receiver money request but that they should have done 'something' to sweeten Jackson's income....both because he deserved more and so that he wouldn't feel so disrespected/unappreciated compared to other players on the team/in the league earning much more money.
Now, just becasue Palantonio's an asshole at times doesn't mean his point is invalid. This got me thinking about Joe Banner's part in this disaster of a season. If, as a team, you committ to drafting a guy with a high pick who is a known primadonna with an inflated ego and maturity issues, then it seems to you should take these factors into consideration when negotiating with him. You don't have to coddle him but you also don't try to humlble him, either publicly or pricvately.
We don't know what has been said by either side in negotiations. But I think most of us can agree that Banner can be an arrogant prick who is inclined to both hard ball tactics and condescension in his interactions. (God know he's made some half-assed public pronouncements about the superiority of the Birds that went well beyond his area of knowledge/experience/expertise.) And we also have the evidence of the shoddy treatment accorded Dawkins, one of the most loved and still valuable Eagles who, if anything, derserved special consideration.
While I still think Castillo was the biggest mistake, there is no question that the way Jackson was handled, and his predicatble response to the situation, have had a highly negative impact on the entire season as well.
He didn't even mention Castillo, and answered in essence that the biggest mistake was, 'Not paying Jackson'. He went on to explain that he didn't mean the FO should have caved to DJax/Rosenpigs' outrageous top 5 receiver money request but that they should have done 'something' to sweeten Jackson's income....both because he deserved more and so that he wouldn't feel so disrespected/unappreciated compared to other players on the team/in the league earning much more money.
Now, just becasue Palantonio's an asshole at times doesn't mean his point is invalid. This got me thinking about Joe Banner's part in this disaster of a season. If, as a team, you committ to drafting a guy with a high pick who is a known primadonna with an inflated ego and maturity issues, then it seems to you should take these factors into consideration when negotiating with him. You don't have to coddle him but you also don't try to humlble him, either publicly or pricvately.
We don't know what has been said by either side in negotiations. But I think most of us can agree that Banner can be an arrogant prick who is inclined to both hard ball tactics and condescension in his interactions. (God know he's made some half-assed public pronouncements about the superiority of the Birds that went well beyond his area of knowledge/experience/expertise.) And we also have the evidence of the shoddy treatment accorded Dawkins, one of the most loved and still valuable Eagles who, if anything, derserved special consideration.
While I still think Castillo was the biggest mistake, there is no question that the way Jackson was handled, and his predicatble response to the situation, have had a highly negative impact on the entire season as well.
Comment