Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Heckert w/ Jody Mac (950 WPEN)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Heckert w/ Jody Mac (950 WPEN)

    Tom Heckert was on with Jody Mac today...caught it on the ride home from a client meeting. You can listen to the podcast below or just enjoy my memory-driven recap.

    http://www.gmppodcast.com/WPEN/JodyM...9/Default.aspx

    Recap:

    1. Jody asks, on a scale of 1-10, how happy Heckert is with the Eagles off-season so far? Heckert said he is very happy since the goals were to re-sign the guys they wanted to keep and on top of that they got Curtis who they like

    2. Jody says lets talk about some of those guys you re-signed. Will Mikell be given the chance to compete for a starting job? Heckert said yes Mikell will challenge for a starting job and offers great value for the team since he can play both safety positions

    3. Jody asks what convinced them to bring back Buck? Heckert said Buck was their preference all along if they could agree on terms with him. They brought in some other guys to evaluate since they were not sure if they could bring Buck back, but is happy they got the deal done. He said Buck proved last season he could be healthy again and worked his a** off.

    4. Jody asked if re-signing Thomas lessens the pressure to bring in another DE? Heckert said yes it probably does, but if they see a DE they value they will go after him. (see below draft position questions). Likes Thomas, thinks he is good depth and good pass rusher.

    5. Jody asked if the Eagles were still actively looking at FA and may make more moves? Heckert said they are still looking and talking to some FA...some guys are waiting to make decisions and so the Eagles may not act until later

    6. Jody asked how likely was Stallworth coming back here? Heckert said it was better than average and the Eagles wanted him back. Stallworth was their first choice, but things did not work out and they are very happy with Curtis.

    7. Jody followed up and asked if they had signed Stallworth, would they have pursued Curtis? Heckert said probably not, Curtis was someone they targeted early in FA and have liked for a while, but they probably would have been done at WR if they signed Stallworth.

    8. Jody asked what in FA this year suprised Heckert and the Eagles? Heckert said not much...they knew there were teams with money to spend and that they would spend it. They are never huge players in FA and knew they would not be this year, but that the teams they assumed would spend big did...referenced the 49ers specifically.

    9. Jody asked if an unexpected star or good player came free, could the Eagles free money up by converting roster bonuses or having players re-structure contracts? Heckert says yes they can convert bonuses and that would be their preference out of those two choices, but yes can free up money to deal with that possible situation.

    10. Jody asked what part of the pre-draft process Heckert likes best? Heckert said the time right now after the combine and workouts are over and the team can fine tune their draft board and really finalize the players they want to target. They make their initial board before the combine once the scouts come in, they visit schools and watch the available tape. Some changes occur due to the interviews and workouts, but not drastically. He really likes the discussions about the players and how to rank them.

    11. Jody asked what draft positions he thought had quality and consistent depth? Heckert stated DE, DT, CB and Safety.

    12. Jody followed up and asked what draft positions did not have depth? Heckert said QB and WR stood out for him.

    13. Jody asked if they had any compensatory picks this year and when they find out from the league? Heckert said they find out next week at the league meetings, but the Eagles do not expect to have any picks this year. Next year they will have several due to the FA they lost.

    14. Jody asked how working with Reid during his time away went and when he plans to be back full-time? Heckert said he and Reid talked 3-4 times daily and his time away had zero effect on their plans or execution. Said Reid planned to be back full-time very soon, but did not know a specific date.
    Eliminate distractions, create energy, fear nothing, and attack everything.

    -Andy Reid

  • #2
    I found several of these issues to be interesting...

    -Heckert mentioned the positions with quality at the top and good depth throughout the draft were DE, DT, CB and Safety...I think this means they definitely go Safety in the first 3 picks and probably CB as well...I could also see a DT later in the draft like Ramsey, possibly the replacement for Hollis? DE seems pretty secure...

    -That Gocong would shift to DE if he could not master LB, but that right away even if he played well at LB that he would be used as a DE in nickel situations to pass rush...I like that move and assume the Eagles saw value in that versatility.

    -That Heckert mentioned QB as a position with quality at the top, but not much depth...will the Eagles grab a QB higher than expected? Or is this not the year they go for their #3?

    -That they really did want Stall and would not have gone after Curtis is they had signed him...
    Eliminate distractions, create energy, fear nothing, and attack everything.

    -Andy Reid

    Comment


    • #3
      Funny how the spinners are talking like we upgraded by getting Curtis over Stall. Doesn't appear that our FO felt that way, but you can disagree with them if you wish.

      I'm glad they think there is some quality at DT, we NEED some more help there. I don't see us going for a DE, tho. Safety and Corner are certainly high on my list as well, tho James could have a good year and be locked up and we are set there.
      http://shop.cafepress.com/content/global/img/spacer.gifOK, let's try this again...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by FRESH
        Funny how the spinners are talking like we upgraded by getting Curtis over Stall. Doesn't appear that our FO felt that way, but you can disagree with them if you wish.

        I'm glad they think there is some quality at DT, we NEED some more help there. I don't see us going for a DE, tho. Safety and Corner are certainly high on my list as well, tho James could have a good year and be locked up and we are set there.
        There may have been a couple of people who said that Curtis was better than Stallworth, but that's painting the rest of the spinners with a pretty wide brush. If you go back and look a lot of them actually said "it's not much of a drop off, and although Stallworth is more talented, Curtis may actually be more productive". May end either way on the production, as it has to do with over all offensive production, but it's not so outlandish an argument as you've seemed to "spin it".
        I gaze into the doorway of temptation's angry flame
        And every time I pass that way I always hear my name.
        Then onward in my journey I come to understand
        That every hair is numbered like every grain of sand.

        Comment


        • #5
          I find his comments about Stallworth strange. If they wanted him, why didn't they sign him? The money was there. WTF was the problem?
          "Hey Giants, who's your Daddy?"

          Comment


          • #6
            What was the problem? They pissed him of with how they negotiated....if you even want to call it that.

            736, I'm not simply talking about what I've seen on THIS board.
            http://shop.cafepress.com/content/global/img/spacer.gifOK, let's try this again...

            Comment


            • #7
              The Stallworth negotiations were botched, plain and simple. I'm not as up in arms about, simply because I see a different skill set in Curtis and I'm willing to wait and see how it works in this offense. But at this point it seems pretty clear that the Eagles wanted Stallworth and got a little too cute, and it cost them. Hopefully it turns out for the best.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by FRESH
                Funny how the spinners are talking like we upgraded by getting Curtis over Stall. Doesn't appear that our FO felt that way, but you can disagree with them if you wish.

                I'm glad they think there is some quality at DT, we NEED some more help there. I don't see us going for a DE, tho. Safety and Corner are certainly high on my list as well, tho James could have a good year and be locked up and we are set there.
                Fresh that's a cheap shot. I know IMHO I have no confidence on Stallworth being there all year. I still wanted him as my first choice but when I look at it honestly, I see an upside in gametime availability that I have to include in my evaluation of Curtis. Besides as I wrote earlier, I am pissed that Stallworth promised us, and by that with his repeated public comments, I mean us fans, that he would give the Eagles a last shot. He lied.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Dutch, perhaps he didn't feel that the Eagles extended him reasonable courtesy.

                  As I said before, if he went to a loser team I would have been ticked at him. Going to the Patriots, I can respect. And you can take it as a cheap shot, if the soe fits, but I have read (and I am not pointing the finger at YOU) about how the Eagles decided Curtis was a better option and we should just trust their judgement...yada, yada. Well, aparently their judgement was that Stall was thier first choice. You get tired of being blindly clubbed with the knee-jerk defenseof the moves of this FO, SOMETIMES even when it wasn't what the FO intended to do. As in this case.
                  http://shop.cafepress.com/content/global/img/spacer.gifOK, let's try this again...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by FRESH
                    What was the problem? They pissed him of with how they negotiated....if you even want to call it that.

                    736, I'm not simply talking about what I've seen on THIS board.
                    I'm aware you weren't just talking about here. But I was involved in the discussion elsewhere, and I think you overstated what was said to support your claim. One thing about spin, it goes both ways. There were people saying Curtis is better, but there were just as many who said he was a #5 at best, and the cheap FO sucked, yada yada yada. Most of us, spinner or not, were somewhere in the middle leaning one way or the other.
                    I gaze into the doorway of temptation's angry flame
                    And every time I pass that way I always hear my name.
                    Then onward in my journey I come to understand
                    That every hair is numbered like every grain of sand.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Wow, I don't recall seeing anyone here saying that they thought Curtis was a better player than Donte or that the Eagles thought that Curtis was a better pick up.

                      While it "could" work out that way, I think the Eagles said all along that they wanted Donte -- but it just didn't get done.

                      Some people even think the agent may have had some influence, I guess that is also another possible story line other than the Eagles just fucked up. And his hammy problems couldn't have had any bearing on how things went, or the drug suspension hanging over his head, Nah couldn't be. Except that for some reason nobody was willing to offer the guy a long term deal, but I guess that just makes the Eagles nuts.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Oh and VFK, thanks for both the updates and translations.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't believe Heckert about Stall. IMO if they wanted him in Philly they would have signed him the first couple of days. What they gave Curtis would have been enough to get Stallworth re-signed. So why not just offer that to him? Because they didn't want him back. I think Heckert was just trying to be nice and not rip on Stall.


                          What I find funny is how when the FO speaks and don't say what some want they are lying. Yet when they say something that they believe all of the sudden they're telling the truth.
                          FRESH > cancer

                          I hate everything the Cowboys stand for. If you think they are America's team, then you support everything that is wrong with America. The excess, the greed, the lack of maturity, the lack of responsibility, the lack of control. - Luzinski's Gut

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by section 736
                            Originally posted by FRESH
                            What was the problem? They pissed him of with how they negotiated....if you even want to call it that.

                            736, I'm not simply talking about what I've seen on THIS board.
                            I'm aware you weren't just talking about here. But I was involved in the discussion elsewhere, and I think you overstated what was said to support your claim. One thing about spin, it goes both ways. There were people saying Curtis is better, but there were just as many who said he was a #5 at best, and the cheap FO sucked, yada yada yada. Most of us, spinner or not, were somewhere in the middle leaning one way or the other.
                            Obviously my comment does not apply to those who think Curtis is a #5. Is that not clear? mea culpa.
                            http://shop.cafepress.com/content/global/img/spacer.gifOK, let's try this again...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Blitz
                              I don't believe Heckert about Stall. IMO if they wanted him in Philly they would have signed him the first couple of days. What they gave Curtis would have been enough to get Stallworth re-signed. So why not just offer that to him? Because they didn't want him back. I think Heckert was just trying to be nice and not rip on Stall.


                              What I find funny is how when the FO speaks and don't say what some want they are lying. Yet when they say something that they believe all of the sudden they're telling the truth.
                              So....you're saying that the FO is lying now...but perhaps not about other things. Was your post directed at yourself???

                              LMAO!!!!!
                              http://shop.cafepress.com/content/global/img/spacer.gifOK, let's try this again...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X